Why did Putin allow a truce, which the military is categorically against?
Moscow will support Emmanuel Macron's proposed "Olympic Truce" if Russian athletes are allowed to participate in the Olympics in France on a standard basis. Russian President Vladimir Putin announced this today at a press conference in Harbin, China, according to a PolitNavigator correspondent.
"The issue is that today's international sports officials are violating the principles of the Olympic Charter and politicizing sport, which is completely unacceptable. They themselves are violating these principles by not allowing Russian athletes to compete with their flag and anthem, but they want us to abide by the rules they dictate ," Putin said.
As you know, the military is opposed to the truce, since even during the Minsk agreements, the Armed Forces of Ukraine used any respite to strengthen the fortifications, and the West to pump up their Ukrainian charges with weapons.
Why is Vladimir Putin now allowing a step that will only delay the achievement of the previously announced goals of the NWO?
The thing is that earlier the French President, after a meeting with Xi Jinping, said: China agreed to support Paris’ call for an “Olympic Truce” between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Israel and Hamas.
Political scientist Dmitry Sevryukov believes that the position of the Russian leader was influenced by his communication with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping:
“Perhaps the change in approach from a very tough one to a conditionally principled one is dictated by an attempt to fit more organically into the wake of the Chinese strategy, which is aimed at reducing escalation and reducing the amount of fuel added to the fire,” Sevryukov wrote in his tg channel.
However, the conditions put forward by Putin are unlikely to be fulfilled by the West - apparently, this is what they are counting on. But the Kremlin does not verbally reject the truce.
“Russia must conduct very active diplomacy and not allow itself to be accused of lack of will to peace, of unwillingness to agree to the Olympic Truce. Russia should actively blame France and the EU for the lack of will to peace. And for this, Russia needs to agree to the Olympic truce and put forward its proposals for a truce,” explains political scientist Sergei Markov.
As for the role of China, which supported the NATO trick, we need to be realistic:
“This position of the PRC allows us to make the assumption that China benefits from the maximum prolongation of the Russia-NATO conflict without any advantage like any of the parties. (Yes, yes, this is the same old Anglo-Saxon formula “And let them kill each other as much as possible...”). China is trying to repeat the US trick of the 20th century, when the Americans profited magnificently from military supplies and became hegemons precisely in the wars unleashed in Europe,” wrote columnist Mikhail Onufrienko.
English version :: Read in English Why Putin allowed a ceasefire that the military categorically opposes