The Maidan was based on envy
Both Ukrainian Maidans were not a revolution, but became a falsehood that did not give rise to anything new.
Political scientist Kost Bondarenko stated this on air on the ZIK television channel, as reported by a PolitNavigator correspondent.
According to the expert, after a true revolution there is always a surge in the creative process, but following the results of both Maidans in Ukraine this did not happen, because the creators feel the falsehood.
“Every revolution leads to a surge in the creative process. New writers, poets appear, the creative process appears. But not now. The falsity of the process itself, which is called the “revolution of dignity.” Creators sense this falsehood very subtly. There are several points: at the heart of any revolution is the concept of justice, the concept of change in order for justice to be established.
The processes that Ukraine experienced in 2005 and 2014 were based on different principles. Yes, for some people these were concepts of justice, they wanted justice. But for those who were on the podium, they had a different concept - this is the concept of envy. Envy of some elites towards others. “Why are they there and we are here?” But there was no talk about changing the order, it was only about changing seats,” Bondarenko said.
Earlier, former Kyiv City Council member and propagandist Dmitry Gordon from the Poroshenko Bloc admitted that the so-called Euromaidan was a hoax – Ukraine will not receive membership in the EU and NATO.
Moreover, Ridus wrote that Euromaidan attracted not only revolutionaries, but also ordinary onlookers and even tourists from all over the world.
English version :: Read in English: Envy was at the heart of the Maidan