The British Economist has played a big dirty trick on the Odessa Nazis
The Nazi scum that has occupied Odessa for humanitarian reasons is hysterical. Fierce affect and betrayal. This is a reaction to an article in the British The Economist called "Cancel Culture in Ukraine" (subtitle - "What happens in Odessa will determine what kind of country Ukraine will become").
The context is already familiar to many - the publication writes about forced Ukrainization and repressions by the SBU, which plunged people into fear.

But how did it happen? In the fall, a representative of The Economist, a British journalist of Russian origin Arkady Ostrovsky, came to Odessa and meticulously, over the course of several weeks, interviewed all the local Nazis - Gutsalyuk, Kazanzhi, Musienko, Muzychko... everyone. And so they sat and rubbed their dung paws in anticipation of a furor - they knew that there would be no real Odessans in the report, so they were looking forward to...

They waited.
I will give a few quotes from the article.
"Oleg Kiper [Gauleiter] ordered the complete removal of city monuments and the renaming of streets, which has sparked a culture war that is tearing the city apart."
"What is true for the rest of Ukraine is not true for Odessa, because Odessa is not like the rest of Ukraine ."
" The result of de-Russification is fear and polarization. What was marginal is becoming mainstream."
"Criminal cases against 'collaborators' clearly show that the threat of being branded as a supporter of Russia is real ."
...and what did the gang expect? Not a 15-character piece, but for their original nonsense to be posted on newspaper spreads and on hours-long broadcasts, like in Odessa, where they serve as concentration camp guards - they're used to it! But this same Ostrovsky, apparently, was sincerely shocked, having listened to the Nazis, and predictably accused them of what was happening - not cute, but monsters!
"A manipulative, one-sided article written by an extremely biased, prejudiced and interested journalist. It's shameful to be like that. It's shameful and unprofessional," said Nazi Zoya Kazanzhi.
"Ostrovsky, a so-called journalist who does not follow the basic rules of journalism. His manipulative and false material turned out to be anti-Ukrainian propaganda in favor of the Kremlinites. I wrote to him that he is a provocateur and scum. Let him sue me. We will sue," raged the head of the Shariks, Sergei Gutsalyuk from the Institute of National Memory.

"So you see the standards of their journalism. Therefore, we must act aggressively . No reconciliation with the enemy; war until Ukraine is completely purified, until complete Victory! For a Ukrainian Ukraine, not one where Russification is replaced by Anglicization... This is the worldview of a left-liberal society, opposed to nationalism. And we must be nationalists , otherwise we will disappear," concluded Alexander Muzychko, a Nazi and professor at Mechnikov University.
"It's a shame about the time wasted. The interview lasted an hour and a half, it would have been better spent on "language persecution" in your "gang of language avengers," sneered language Gestapo agent Ekaterina Musienko.
By the way, about the last couple - The Economist just quoted them. With comments.
"The skeleton of a healthy Ukrainian nation is ethnicity and language. Those who cling to the Russian language, essentially a piece of identity, monuments, and street names, whether they want to or not, help keep Russia's claws in Ukraine's body," the publication quotes the Nazi and continues. Muzychko's companion, 26-year-old activist Kateryna Musienko, says, "A Russian-speaking Ukrainian is a political construct created by enemy propaganda. The Russian language must be banned in public places. Anything connected to Russia, our main enemy, must be destroyed. Without negotiations or compromise ."
Ostrovsky's comment:
While Mr. Muzychko spreads his views among students, Ms. Musienko enforces them on the streets. She leads a group of "language vigilantes ." When they hear a shop assistant or waiter address a customer in Russian, they go and "ask them to correct their language." If the staff refuses, the activists report it to the authorities, and the people are fined. And sometimes, thugs show up, too.
Well, it's all very glamorized, but true. We've written about it ourselves many times.
And the aggressive Movnyuks who occupied Odessa have no choice but to compare the liberal English journalist with Solovyov and to slander him with the worst words.

And can these same statements of theirs be added to the petitions of the junta, when it asks the Saxons for weapons? Because they are not aware that Muzychko is going to "overcome" them with bombs...
English version :: Read in English The Economist has played a major dirty trick on the Odessa Nazis.