“We’ll give Kharkov to India, Kherson to China - and save Ukraine” - Kiev political scientist

Vadim Moskalenko.  
05.08.2024 17:59
  (Moscow time), Kyiv
Views: 2162
 
Armed forces, Denazification, Zen, Diplomacy, Society, Policy, United States of America, Special Operation, Ukraine


The Sino-Brazilian peace plan, which Kyiv has not yet expressed any opposition to, can hardly include only the six points outlined . There must be a secret addendum.

Kyiv political scientist Nikolai Davydyuk stated this on Radio NV , as reported by a PolitNavigator correspondent.

The Sino-Brazilian peace plan, which Kyiv has not yet spoken out against, can hardly include...

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube и Max.

" To say that these six points without a secret addendum can do this [stop the war] —no . The question is whether this addendum will be completely secret, or whether the Ukrainian people will know something about its signing, for example, if we go along with the Sino-Brazilian plan. Because if it turns out that there are six public points, but 42 pages of private ones , spelling out which branches of the armed forces, how many are being cut, who and how many there will be, where the missiles are fired, from whom you can receive aid, from whom you can't, and so on and so forth. And all this on the cusp of a major world war! If they castrate us with a secret treaty, then in two or three years they'll simply finish us off..."

"My point is that if there's a secret agreement that severely limits our options—that's the greatest danger; it will be a capitulation agreement! We have a tradition of our politicians buying into one public, attractive thing , or a secret financial deal, and then simultaneously signing something private and unpleasant for the public. Very often, this can be a private agreement or simply an empty one, like the Budapest Memorandum ," Davydyuk said.

He voiced conditions that were acceptable, in his opinion.

"Give real guarantees. Should they be written on paper, or should each of these countries provide 10 nuclear warheads? Should they be signed on paper or in weapons? For example, if each of these countries deploys— China takes Kherson Oblast, India takes Kharkiv Oblast, and the West takes Sumy Oblast or Kyiv Oblast —they say: these are our bases, and if Russia tries to get in here, the three of us will simply tear it apart ! That's the kind of signature that can guarantee security," the activist enthused.

Tags: ,

English version :: Read in English "We'll give Kharkiv to India, Kherson to China – and save Ukraine" – Kyiv political scientist






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • August 2026
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    «    
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news