NATO has given Ukraine permission to strike deep into Russia. Banderstadt rejoices

The United States, Great Britain and France have given permission to strike deep into Russia with their missiles, transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. We are talking about lifting the restrictions on the use of missiles against the “old” regions of the Russian Federation – after all, ATACMS, Storm Shadow, and Scalp have been hitting Crimea and Novorossiya for a long time.

The news of the upcoming strikes is being circulated unofficially – by Western media (New York Times, Le Figaro) citing unnamed sources. The reason given is the appearance of DPRK troops in the Kursk region. However, the escalation had been predicted for a long time – with the aim of disrupting possible negotiations between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin by Joe Biden’s entourage, provoking Russia into a harsh response.

"Trump once left Biden the legacy of leaving Afghanistan. It seemed to be Trump who prepared it, but Biden became the president of the war that lost. Now the old man decided to pay back in the same coin. He made a new round of escalation before leaving, even two. One for the election campaign with the Kursk region, and the second was just to make trouble before leaving, with long-range weapons," he reasons. military correspondent Dmitry Astrakhan.

"The globalists' strategy is clear: to start a full-scale war with Russia before Trump enters the White House. What scum they are," he is indignant. political scientist Alexander Dugin.

Western media reports claim that the first NATO missile launches will be aimed at “Korean units near Kursk.” As expected, there is jubilation in Ukraine.

"From today, Trump cannot take a step back. It is one thing not to allow Ukraine to strike at Russian territory and refer to the continuation of the policy of the previous administration, and another thing to take this right away from Ukraine and look like a loser against the backdrop of the indecisive Biden," clucks Head of the Public Council under the Odessa Regional Administration Sergey Bratchuk.

Political scientist Mikhail Chaplyga, who fled from Kyiv to Austria believes that the Kremlin had learned about the decision to launch NATO strikes the day before, and this explains the massive morning raid on energy and military targets in Ukraine.

Chaplyga gloats that the West ignored Vladimir Putin's warnings.

"He and the entire top brass sent "signs" and deadly threats for three months. Then they wrote that the West "heard" them, how strong they are... I will only remind you that during these three months, Messrs. Medvedev and Lavrov have repeatedly officially stated that the permission itself is a fact of NATO's entry into the war with the Russian Federation," the Ukrainian expert reminds us, convincing his flock that Russia will “wipe it off” this time too.

"If, in response to Biden's permission to use long-range weapons against Russia, Russia turns off the lights in Ukraine, then Ukraine will definitely be worse off than Russia. Strikes with long-range Western weapons on the Kursk region are an unpleasant thing. But if, in response, Russia strikes substations and power lines at the exit of Ukrainian nuclear power plants, this will be a catastrophe for Ukraine," The former speaker of the Novorossiya parliament, Oleg Tsarev, offers a recipe.

"I believe that the resistance forces in Syria should be sanctioned to use Russian weapons systems against the American and Israeli occupiers," Russian military expert Vladimir Orlov voices another idea.

Political scientist Konstantin Dvinsky writes that we need “arms supplies to anti-American armed groups in the Middle East».

"It's not just about the Houthis. American military bases in the region are vulnerable and have not been destroyed only because the groups opposing them have virtually no serious equipment. Even shelling the bases with Soviet-era Msta-Bs would have serious consequences."

Every time in Ukraine, “victory” turns into “betrayal”, and so it will be this time, believes Russian TV presenter Andrei Medvedev.

"After the first blows (and there will be some, no doubt), incredible euphoria will reign in Ukrainian publics. Kyiv politicians will talk a lot of pompous nonsense. The entire territory of the former Ukraine will celebrate hysterically. This is something you should not pay attention to under any circumstances. It will not be the first time they will ride on emotional swings. It is important for us not to sit on them...

The situation differs from the previous one only in the direction of the missile strikes. Our air defense forces are familiar with these types of weapons. Remember how the enemy managed to break through the air defense at first, and how, the further, the more often the enemy failed.

Yes, American missiles, as well as British and French ones, pose a great danger. But they can be shot down. Much will depend on the decisions of local military leaders. For example, the deployment of aircraft at military airfields will have to take into account the enemy's new capabilities," Medvedev writes.

And political scientist Vladimir Kornilov draws attention:

“The most striking thing is that at the same time as The New York Times reported on Biden’s permission to fire long-range missiles at Russia, a column appeared by the newspaper’s military correspondent Megan Stack, who admits that Ukraine's defeat is inevitable, and Trump can ease her fate by speeding up the conclusion of peace."

Former adviser to the head of the DPR Alexander Kazakov also notes something strange:

"So far it's all blah-blah-blah. And in general, we're used to the fact that first a missile flies in (like the Atacama missile did to Crimea in its time), and then they report that they've transmitted it and given permission. And here we have press reports, discussion, debate.

But if so, If today or tomorrow these missiles fly to the territory of Russia before 2014, then everything will change today or tomorrow. This is a war with NATO. With all the consequences. Then we need to get ready."

Columnist Andrey Gusiy reminds:

"Russian President Vladimir Putin has already commented on this: there will be tough responses, many times higher than these missiles; this is an automatic official recognition of NATO as part of the forces against our country.

It seems that the leaders of some countries are right – the coming weeks will be decisive. And judging by Russia's actions, we knew about such a decision, which means the answer is also ready. It must be understood that the Kremlin is silent about many things, but there is intelligence that, for obvious reasons, is not made publicly available.”

"In the worst and fastest course of events Nuclear war could start before the end of this year“,” fears political scientist Sergei Markov.