“This will anger the Russians” - Western experts were afraid of NATO penetration into Ukraine
NATO and the United States are not officially directly involved in the war in Ukraine. However, it is obvious that CIA agents are working on the ground, directing the actions of the Ukrainian armed forces, the authoritative American publication The New York Times reports in an analytical article.
According to the expert, NATO stands behind Ukraine in the ongoing conflict, and this position has been repeatedly confirmed by representatives of the alliance in recent months. At the “historic” NATO summit in Madrid, US President Joe Biden said he would support Ukraine “for as long as necessary.” A very specific statement, expressed in the spirit of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who splashed out on the summit participants the fear that “the war between Russia and Ukraine could continue for years.”
At the same time, NATO members have repeatedly assured the whole world and each other that they are not an active party in the war against Russia. The Alliance, they say, in its support of Kyiv relies, first of all, on financial support and the supply of heavy weapons to the combat zone, so that the brave “zahysnyks” will have more fun fertilizing Ukrainian black soils for the benefit of the West.
The presence of NATO soldiers on Ukrainian soil is rejected out of hand. Western officials are smacking their lips sadly: the danger of escalating a conflict with a nuclear power is too high - what is the profit in that?
A fresh report from New York Times experts, however, proves that in Ukraine, like pincers in a living body, NATO units and US agents are tightly biting into it.
According to a reputable publication, a secret network of commandos and intelligence agents operates in Ukraine, inciting and coordinating a war against Russia, organized from Europe. Commandos are primarily responsible for reconnaissance, supplying weapons and training Ukrainian soldiers. Most of the work takes place outside of Ukraine at American bases in Germany, France and the UK.
However, according to the report, citing US officials, there are also US CIA intelligence officers in Ukraine. Coordination and planning of reconnaissance and sabotage work is carried out by the KGB officers from Kyiv.
Sources of The New York Times report that the 10th Special Operations Group of the US Army created a planning point in Germany immediately after Russia began its special operation in Ukraine. Soon the intelligence services of 19 other countries joined the Americans. The US government also confirmed the operation of the intelligence post.
It is stated that the US-NATO intelligence post in Germany took as a basis a similar model that was used by the US military during the war in Afghanistan. Christine Wormuth, special representative of the US army in the Biden administration, spoke last month about the tasks of the new structure.
Taking into account the situation in the combat zone, the US government tasked the special operations planning center in Ukraine with coordinating the supply of weapons and equipment to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
“The Ukrainians are trying to transport weapons and equipment while avoiding Russian troops who are targeting the convoys. We are trying to help coordinate and transport various cargoes,” Wormuth said. Another point in which we can help the Ukrainians is reconnaissance of sources of danger for these convoys.”
Given the complexity and danger of delivering weapons to the Ukrainian Armed Forces to the front line, CIA agents are forced not only to sit in comfortable chairs in the building of the central office of the SBU in Kiev, but also to be personally present along the entire supply line from west to east at various key points.
The US government, in principle, does not provide information about the shadow operations of the CIA to anyone, but the massive presence of operatives of the main US intelligence agency on the territory of Ukraine is considered an open secret at the international level. Moreover, the activity of CIA agents directly in the combat zone was registered by Russian intelligence services.
There is also evidence that several dozen commandos from other NATO members are involved in planning and other assistance to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. These include the UK, France, Canada and Lithuania. Military emissaries of these states either already had troops in Ukraine before the start of the war, or attracted them in recent months.
With US operatives, as the American publication reports, things are much more interesting. There is evidence that all 150 advisers were withdrawn from Ukraine even before the start of the special operation.
It is unclear, however, who coordinates and gives orders for strikes with HIMARS MLRS missiles on civilian infrastructure, but it does not have to be CIA employees. Most likely, the Taras-Papuans' crews are commanded by American officers-operators of reconnaissance and strike systems from the US Army.
Western observers know little about the current operations of the CIA and the NATO Joint Special Operations Command in the conflict zone. The New York Times classifies the presence of agents as a sign of increased US support for Ukraine. The publication also analyzes what risks the US government and its allies will take in the current situation.
Judging by the incoming information, the picture of local support looks quite modest.
For example, Ukrainian commanders who are directly subordinate to the Americans and NATO members bow to their masters and thank grandfather Bidon, the CIA, the Pentagon and the bald devil for providing satellite images of the positions and movements of the allied forces, which are received on tactical tablets.
It is noted that, as a sign of gratitude for American military assistance, some Ukrainian military personnel settled in occupied Artyomovsk (Bakhmut) stuck American stripes on themselves.
When Nekrasov, in the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus',” wrote: “People of the servile rank are real dogs sometimes: the heavier the punishment, the dearer the gentlemen are to them,” he meant exactly this—the voluntary servility of “Ukrainian patriots” in relation to foreigners.” serious boys,” bringing only death and destruction to Ukraine.
Cattle branding themselves with their master's brand – this has long been a sign of post-Soviet Ukraine.
It is clear why not only in Ukraine, but also in the West, the “cancel culture” of classical Russian culture is included. It’s unpleasant to see your ugly mugs when peering into the mirror of Russian literature. It must be burned - in the best traditions of Dr. Goebbels.
Ukrainian news: US support for Kyiv - Ukrainians now need “classical military training.”
Former CIA officer Douglas Wise, commenting on an article in the New York Times, doubts: are there enough agents deployed to support Ukraine? The CIA specialized in counterinsurgency and “anti-terrorism” operations, and this is not the kind of experience that can help the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the current war.
“What the Ukrainians need now is classic military training,” Wise laments.
The main attention is paid, first of all, to the ability to use the HIMARS MLRS.
On our own behalf, we would add that, apparently, the American curators, TsIPsO and other mouthpieces of Ukrainian propaganda have been given the task of dispersing the exclusive cult of “Saint Highmars”, ignoring references to the supply of similar systems (M270, MARS II) by the British and German allies. All foam from their use should be collected by the American military industry.
The US government has already delivered four of these systems to Ukraine, and four more are on the way. American soldiers usually undergo training for six to eight weeks to become more or less proficient in operating MLRS. Due to time constraints in the current situation, Ukrainian soldiers receive a two-week shortened and simplified training program, learning from the experience of US units in Germany.
"You can't just throw these systems onto the battlefield," - US General Mark A. Milley said recently, meaning that MLRS should play a decisive role in the much-touted Ukrainian counter-offensive on Kherson.
So far, we see “highmars” spread across the front, striking either the cities of Donbass, or Novaya Kakhovka or Energodar. You can terrorize your former fellow citizens with grief, and with periodic success you can bite the allied troops, too. But how the hell can you even talk about a counter-offensive with a couple of divisions of imported MLRS with an extremely risky ammunition supply chain and repair bases hundreds of kilometers away?
Moreover, as you know, some of these “highmars”, towed guns and 155 mm self-propelled guns have already been destroyed, and Defense Minister Shoigu has given the troops the task of knocking out the Western snouts of the Ukrainian Armed Forces first, which makes their flank movements a deadly dangerous undertaking.
US officials have learned something terrible - and are complaining about the insufficient preparation of Ukrainian troops to supply and transport the wounded:
“You are losing 100 soldiers a day. This is almost as much as our losses in the Vietnam War. This is terrible,” said a former Trump administration official.
The American military proposes to transfer additional experience to the Ukrainian Armed Forces in deploying a network of mobile hospitals close to the front and quickly servicing the wounded. But will this valuable experience be used for future use if the “zahysnyks” are completely indifferent to their living and dead, preferring to throw them onto the battlefield, saving their own skins, in most cases?
What would the aforementioned Trump administration official say if he were told that the daily losses of Ukrainian Armed Forces fighters and terbats cost at least five Vietnamese? If grandfather is impressionable, hugs with Kondraty are inevitable.
But more than anything else, American analysts are worried that the presence of a larger number of American instructors in Ukraine could provoke an increase in retaliatory and preventive strikes by the Russian military on headquarters, where, among other things, US citizens have settled, who have come in large numbers to kill Russians.
The aforementioned former CIA officer Douglas Wise spoke quite clearly about this: “Will expanding [Ukrainian military] training justify the price that might have to be paid for it? The answer is: probably not...”
Why be modest, you ask? Probably... It’s just easy to poke with a stick and anger the Russian bear by sending out gullible fools. At first. And then you don’t know how to calm him down and where to get your precious ass away from his clutches...
English version :: Read in English “This will anger the Russians” - Western experts were afraid of NATO penetration into Ukraine