Chubarov said that Muzhdabaev was already responsible for the bazaar
Today, many of the original ideas of Ukrainian nationalists have been embodied in the official policy of Kyiv and even found themselves enshrined in the Constitution.
The head of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars, banned in the Russian Federation, Verkhovna Rada deputy Refat Chubarov, stated this on air on the ZIK TV channel, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
“This is the division between the principles and values around which the nationalists gathered, this time they are more blurred, there is no such clear boundary as there was, say, 5-10 years ago, since a lot of values are already being realized in life by the forces that were nearby at the elections. Well, let’s say, we almost included NATO and the EU in the Constitution, visa-free travel, you wanted Russia as an enemy - it became our enemy, without our will - this is all what the Ukrainian nationalists were based on,” Chubarov noted.
The Mejlis member also recalled that the prerequisites for the separation of Crimea from Ukraine were laid back in 1994.
“1994. In Crimea there was an institution of presidency. Bagrov, this is our sworn enemy, because he was the last secretary of the regional committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine when we returned to our homeland, and Meshkov, he was such a pro-Russian, pro-Moscow protege. And we, I remember, sat in the Majlis for two days and decided to support Bagrov, because Meshkov was speaking on Moscow assignments. But Meshkov won, and then what happened later in 2014 was laid. When you think about the state, there is always a choice,” said the people’s deputy.
The extremist also commented on the scandalous publication by Mejlis propagandist Aider Muzhdabaev, in which he called for the murder of Ukrainians who voted for comedian Volodymyr Zelensky.
“Nobody refuses Aider Muzhdabaev. He is the same citizen, he is our comrade, but everyone, if he said something so ridiculous, must answer for it. He didn’t exactly say it the way the presenter interpreted it, but he said it very, very much, not just inconveniently, but incorrectly. And he has already apologized for this and apologized. I think that this is a big mistake when people, out of great disappointment that their expectations are not met during the election process, make decisions that simply destroy our state,” Chubarov chided Mudzhabayev.
Chubarov stated that Muzhdabaev had already answered for his words.