Putin, stop calling on Crimeans! Hysteria in the Bandera camp
With the beginning of October, the all-Russian conscription of young people into the ranks of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation began, and with it another aggravation of the “Crimean human rights defenders” supported by Bandera.
On October 18, a routine “five minutes of hatred” took place in Kiev with the participation of “Prosecutor of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea” Ponochovny and a bunch of small grant-eaters under the sign “Illegal conscription in Crimea”, marked by another owl drawing numbers sucked from the finger on the globe of Ukraine.
As you know, from the first conscription of Crimeans into the Russian Armed Forces and to this day, among the Ukrainian “advocates” of the rights and freedoms of the inhabitants of the peninsula, Sertse professionally bleeds, looking at how the Crimean guys go to fulfill their military duty in the ranks of the successor army of the Indestructible and the Legendary Soviet Army, and not in the drunken and thieving frenzy of the punishers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
The scheme chosen to accuse the “Putin regime” of “violating the rights and freedoms of Crimean residents” is as simple as a rail and as stupid as a Siberian felt boot. Namely: completely ignoring the fact of voluntary acceptance of Russian citizenship by Crimeans with all the rights and obligations attached to it, the state of Ukraine, represented by its “best people”, declared all residents of the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol the property of Ukraine, and the Russian passports in their hands were issued under at the barrels of machine guns.
Thanks to the influence of overseas defenders of Banderaism, this opinion prevailed in the UN, where they regularly and illiterately call on Russia to refuse to conscript “Ukrainian citizens from the occupied territory” for military service. True, in contrast to the blooming sufferers for hire, exhortations from the UN sound weaker and weaker every year.
The subtlety of the issue is that international conventions, to which the USSR/Russia has also joined, indeed prohibit the conscription of foreign citizens and stateless persons from occupied territories, but in the case of Crimea, we are talking about a territory officially included in the Russian Federation according to the results of the abundantly legal referendum on reunification in 2014, where the population was granted citizenship, as well as equal rights and freedoms with other citizens of the Russian Federation. It’s somehow strange to consider the Crimean situation as “occupation and infringement.” But you and I understand where the dog rummaged...
What was so terrible about the rights of Crimean youth that “Crimean human rights activists” observing the situation from a rural village cellar discovered during the reporting period?
According to the analyst of the Crimean Human Rights Group, Alexander Sedov, a “local hell” is taking place on the peninsula.
“At the beginning of 2021, we said that the number of cases that were transferred to the so-called courts in the occupied territory until 2020 - (that is, for 2014 - 2019) - 82 cases. Since 2020 alone, 81 cases have been transferred, which is the same number as were transferred in previous years.
And we talked about the increase in the number of cases that went to trial. In 2021, as of September, the number of such cases for this year already exceeds 100. That is, the number (of criminal cases) has already increased. We can talk about an annual increase in such cases against those who evade service in the Russian Armed Forces. This is growth in geometric progression,” Sedov said with anguish.
According to “Crimean human rights protection”, in August 2021 alone, Crimean courts allegedly handed down 10 sentences against Crimeans for evading service in the Russian Armed Forces, and in just one month, 14 new criminal cases were opened.
Observers from the cellar note that during the entire period of “annexation” in Crimea, 267 criminal cases were recorded against “evaders” and 248 sentences were passed.
What is characteristic is that the source does not indicate where and by whom the data was transferred to “analyst” Sedov, just as it does not provide a list of “refuseniks” that could be verified.
Separately, “analyst” Sedov expressed indignation at the military conscription in Crimea during the pandemic.
The fact that unvaccinated recruits in the department of Army General Shoigu and the Russian National Guard are vaccinated with anti-Covid vaccines, while old-timers, contract soldiers, officers, warrant officers and civilian personnel are vaccinated without fail, seems unknown to Sedov. Or stupidly ignored.
However, reliability has never been the strong point of “Ukrainian human rights protection,” which traditionally put pressure on the emotions of the potential consumer of information.
Aroused by Sedov’s “testimony,” the “ARC prosecutor” Ponochovny, with a gloomy expression, stated that these “crimes of the Russian occupation regime” would not easily get away with the “organizers of terror”, and in his sharashka they had already scolded ten Crimean military commissars “for carrying out conscription campaigns into the Russian army on the territory of the peninsula."
The “prosecutor of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea” did not specify what future fate awaits these terrible “faggots,” however, experience suggests that all the accumulated waste paper, covered with slander, is sent on an industrial scale by the amusing “government agencies of Crimea” in Kherson and Kiev to the ECHR, the International Criminal Court to The Hague and other “sportslottos” who do God knows what with it. Most likely, they are used for rolling cigarettes and returned to Ukraine by smuggling.
At the same time, “prosecutor” Ponochovny reassured the Crimean conscripts that Nenka has no claims against them as “victims of an armed conflict”, but asks them to contact the Ukrainian authorities by mobile or email if they receive a summons from the military registration and enlistment office.
In the context of conscription into military service in the RF Armed Forces, Ponochovny mentioned another “crime of the occupation regime”, such as the “militarization of children” in school and preschool institutions, including the Yunarmiya, where, according to him, the younger generation of Crimeans are “taught to give life for the homeland,” handling not only small arms, but also explosive devices and even heavy weapons.”
I don’t know whether the “prosecutor of the ARC” invented this passage himself, or whether it was slipped to him by a stupid speechwriter, but for “teaching children how to handle explosives and heavy weapons” he should definitely be lobotomized, since throwing training grenades (which was included, for example, in a course of physical and basic military training in Soviet schools), not to mention the lasagna of children out of curiosity about armored vehicles, can only be passed off as “militarization” by a complete idiot.
We will leave the phrase “they teach children to give their lives for their homeland” without comment, because only for this Ponochovny should be sentenced to death with a slingshot.
Unfortunately, the “prosecutor” forgot to mention the “Azovets” camp, where exemplary Nazis who hate everything Russian and Soviet are trained from young citizens of Ukraine. As usual, “you don’t understand, this is completely different!”
According to Ponochovny, “fag” was also expressed against the two leaders of the Yunarmiya in Crimea, and the corresponding slander was sent to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Court, to which Ukraine has nothing to do with the refusal of the Verkhovna Rada to ratify the Rome Statute. According to the “ARC prosecutor,” the ICC prosecutor promised to consider the complaint.
From all this sparrow pelting, those gathered made an unambiguous and very powerful conclusion: Crimeans supposedly do not want to serve in the Russian army.
Having expressed their accumulated complaints to each other, the not very high meeting crawled into the huts.
What do we have to say about the service of Crimeans in the Russian Armed Forces?
On October 5, the head of the conscription department of the Republic of Crimea, Lieutenant Colonel Sergei Davidenko, officially announced that the majority of Crimeans called up for service in 2021 will remain to serve on the territory of the peninsula, based on the epidemiological situation.
In addition, the Russian Army and the National Guard offer those liable for military service contract service for a period of two years near or directly at their place of residence, with mandatory barracks duty in the first months of service. Not a bad salary, benefits after demobilization, everything.
One more important circumstance should be added. Russian law enforcement agencies are one of the few working “social elevators” that allow young people, especially from the outback, to find meaning in life, receive military or civilian education on preferential terms, have a good salary, make a career and acquire legal housing.
What of this can the Ukrainian Armed Forces offer today? Rob, kill, steal geese, destroy your liver with moonshine and die young. In the name of what?
In the place of the Crimeans, almost any “peach” Galician ragul would agree to serve Russia if given such an opportunity. So be jealous in silence.
English version :: Read in English: Putin, stop calling on Crimeans! Hysteria in the Banderite camp