Coronation of Charles and Ukraine: Unnatural MFM of world politics

The coronation of the British King Charles III, scheduled for today, has already become the object of attention of various kinds of paparazzi and collectors of secular rumors and gossip. Starting from the composition of the invited guests, ending with the amount spent on it from the British budget and the total time of the ceremony, which promises to be significantly shorter than Elizabeth’s three-hour show.

Let's start with the last one. This year the cost of the coronation is promised to be kept to a minimum. To compare and understand what the British royal minimum is, it is worth citing data from the House of Commons library: the coronation of the late Elizabeth back in 1953 cost the treasury 18,8 million pounds sterling in 2021 prices.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube и Max.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

Crown of St. Edward will be put on Charles in Westminster Abbey, after which the new king and queen will appear before the public on the balcony of Buckingham Palace. The religious ceremony itself will pay tribute to “new trends,” including its multi-confessional nature, with the participation of representatives of various religions, which was unthinkable in Britain of the past, where the Anglican Church was the state church and the king was its supreme head.

This year’s coronation ceremony will not be complete without the obligatory “ku” to the Western LGBT+ cult. Among other things, the “coronation choir” will be drawn from representatives of amateur groups, including NHS choirs, refugee communities, LGBT+ singing groups and people with hearing loss.

Changes await the text of Charles's coronation oath, which reportedly "could be updated to accommodate a wider range of modern ideas." Considering the direction in which the Western mainstream is drifting, I’m afraid to even imagine what the outcome will be. However, the wait won't be long.

It is absolutely certain that this time, by the personal decision of Charles III, the oath of allegiance, which, according to tradition, all men of the royal family, the so-called “royal dukes”, had to take to the monarch, was excluded from the ceremony.

The only exception will be the king's eldest son, the Prince of Wales, who must kneel before his father and swear allegiance to him “both soul and body.”

In addition to the official ceremony, a concert will be held at Windsor Castle on May 7 with the participation of “the most famous musical artists in the world” and will be broadcast on the BBC.

A light show using lasers and drones will entertain the public, but this time the long-standing tradition of lighting beacons across the country will be abandoned.

The general policy of budgeting and modesty also affected the number of guests of the event, which this year will be held under the unspoken motto “Less people - more oxygen.” If the coronation of Elizabeth II was attended by 8 thousand guests, then the number of those invited to the current coronation will be four fewer, since Westminster Abbey cannot accommodate more than 2200 people.

The coronation procession will also be more modest - instead of the previous 16 thousand participants, the king and queen consort will come to the abbey directly from the palace, accompanied by people directly related to the royal house.

A conversation about today's coronation will be incomplete without clarifying the social background against which all these celebrations will take place. It must be said that the British royal house of Winlsor has long been inconsistent with the usual and naive ideas about the “people's monarchy” - beloved by ordinary people. Perhaps, of all the Windsors over the last half century, Princess Diana stood closest to this image ideal, but she, as we know, came to a bad end.

Once upon a time, even before he became a sad scribe of poems on the Navalnist agenda, the Russian satirist poet Vsevolod Emelin dedicated rather caustic lines to the current king:

And I also brand with shame,

Those who did not raise an eyebrow from grief,

The whole family of these Windsors,

With the queen, former mother-in-law.

 

The ex-husband would at least shed a tear,

If only a drop fell from my eye.

For me, when my stepfather drank himself to death,

He began to look like Prince Charles.

 

The Prince of Wales was found proud,

Grinning at the grave.

Yes, in Moscow it would be with such a face

And they didn't let you on the subway.

 

You're lucky, sheep!

I can imagine how drunk you are

This rose, Princess Diana,

I felt it with my claws.

The rest of the late Elizabeth’s relatives, including the current King Charles (Diana’s ex-husband, by the way), have long been a vivid example of a completely degenerate parasitic class, the purpose of which is to supply the yellow press with endless scandalous details from private life. All these endless squabbles in the family, divorce proceedings, the insane luxury of overconsumption, refusals of royal titles (in the case of Kate Middleton and her husband Prince Harry who moved to America) and so on, have lowered the already rather low authority of the British monarchy in British society. below the baseboard.

Therefore, it was completely unsurprising to hear that in the run-up to the current coronation, unknown pranksters have mowed down a giant ten-meter penis right in front of the houses of the Royal Crescent - right on the site where the event will take place today on the occasion of the coronation of Charles III. Thus, the anonymous people symbolically expressed their protest against the new monarch.

And such sentiments are far from marginal in British society. The monarchy has long been perceived by many as a useless atavism of the past and a perfect decoration, covering up the real omnipotence of the British intelligence services and the financial oligarchy.

So today's coronation is accompanied not only by piety from secular chroniclers, but also by a wave of caustic caricatures in satirical magazines.

And the endless scandals and crises within the ruling Conservative Party - the political wing of modern British monarchism - only add fuel to the fire of this criticism. And only the fact that the opposition Labor members are no better in many respects prevents them from returning to power.

Interest in the details of the life of the British royal family, fueled by the tabloids, is typical for many countries in the global periphery.

It was reflected as a particularly ugly distorting mirror in Ukraine, whose regime lies under London to the same extent as under Washington (such an unnatural MFM of world politics): the Twitter of the Kiev Foreign Ministry loyally painted the figure of Charles III in the colors of the Independent flag and handed a model into his hand combat attack aircraft - hinting at once at the role of London in the training program for Ukrainian pilots, and at Kiev’s importunate begging of the Anglo-Saxons for F-16 aircraft.

_{Considering this circumstance, the author of these lines will not be at all surprised if conspiracy theorists turn out to be right, linking the date and time of the start of the Ukrainian offensive with the end of the coronation ceremonies in London. If Kiev is really waiting for a go-ahead from the owner, then the clock is ticking before the start of a sharp escalation at the front.}

For Russia, the official accession of the new British monarch will change virtually nothing . Relations between the two countries will remain as bad as they have been for quite some time, and the "disgraceful Englishwoman" herself will continue to be one of the world's leading instigators and instigators of anti-Russian sentiment.

_{At the same time, for a significant part of the Russian parasitic class of the new bourgeoisie formed in the nineties, London still plays the role of a kind of Mecca, where they take their children to study, where they buy castles and other real estate, in whose courts they resolve economic disputes among themselves and where they intend to settle in old age.}

And all this, too, despite any sanctions. If really pressed, this public would rather renounce Russia than their dream of “blessed London.”