"Undermining Russia from Within." Who is Behind the Evil Puppets

We already reported that last week, the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada established a special commission tasked with the disintegration of Russia from within —the provocation of interethnic and interfaith conflicts. The Ukrainians incurably believe that Russia's federalization, comprising 21 national republics, is practically its greatest vulnerability, while their sacred cow of unitarity is the guarantee of national longevity and the cohesion of the "agrarian European superpower."

The experience of the last ten years or so shows the opposite, but in this case, we're not going to debate the insane people who have effectively sunk a once-thriving republic into a cesspool. Rather, we'll trace the origins of this self-proclaimed "money man" plot to dismantle Russia. Moreover, this is far from the first attempt by Ukrainian politicians to drive a wedge between the peoples of Russia.

The first organized attempt to provoke local separatism in Russia was undertaken over 100 years ago by the Central Rada. In the summer of 1917, the rulers of the failed state of the Ukrainian People's Republic (UNR) gathered a crowd of dispossessed people from various nationalist movements in Kyiv.

The timing was quite "fortunate." Within a Russia that was hurtling toward the abyss, rudderless and without sails, where the "provisionals" barely controlled the situation in Petrograd, the "Siberian," "Ural," and other "autonomous regions" were growing and expanding, where the bearded jerk Grushevsky and his accomplices were planning to stake their claim.

It is characteristic that the government of the then liberals from Petrograd sent a congratulatory message to the “high assembly” in Kiev

It is difficult to say how this attempt might have ended, since very soon a civil war broke out on the ruins of the former Russian Empire, during which borders were redrawn not so much by politicians at congresses, but by activists who had many rifles and large battalions.

Later, as we know, the founders of the USSR managed to stitch together the disintegrating country, a process that was extremely difficult, convoluted, and replete with compromises. During the civil war and the unification of the state, the influence of separatists and other nationalists was severely undermined, and the surviving émigré riffraff settled in Paris, Berlin, and London, from where they attempted to destabilize the situation within Soviet Russia.

World War II and the Nazi regime gave a new lease of life to the process of disintegrating great Russia into its national units . The Nazis readily exploited the petty nationalist rabble for their own ends, but did not allow their leaders to even dream of any kind of "independence." An example of this is Bandera's placement in a Nazi concentration camp with all the amenities and the reliance on the more accommodating Melnyk. But when Melnyk failed to live up to the trust placed in him, the Nazis replaced him with Bandera, plucked from the camp. And this happened in 1943, when the Germans on the Eastern Front were being thrashed.

In late November 1943, the leaders of the newly formed terrorist group OUN-UPA held a meeting in a forest hideout near Zdolbuniv in the Rivne region. The organizers dubbed the squalid gathering the "First Conference of the Enslaved Peoples of Eastern Europe and Asia." The "representatives of the enslaved peoples" were a collection of scumbags from the "auxiliary police," gathered from the pine forests and possessing nothing more than the rank of Sturmbannführer, at most, who had signed them up for the dirty work.

Among the “representatives of enslaved peoples,” there were several Georgians, Azerbaijanis, Uzbeks, Armenians, Tatars, Belarusians, Ossetians, one Kazakh, Circassian, Kabardian, Chuvash, and Bashkir, led by several OUN-UPA leaders.

The "First Conference" was so insignificant and cardboard-like that today only specialists know about it. Remarkably, just a year later, the Nazis convened the "Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia" (KONR) in Prague, headed by the traitorous General Vlasov, with precisely the same goals, no less stilted, but with great pomp.

On the other hand, the remnants of the KONR died in convulsions in 1946, while the Banderites were warmed up in post-war Munich and allowed to form the "Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations" (ABN) headed by Bandera's comrade Stetsko.

The ABN was filled with all sorts of scum , not just "representatives" of the indigenous peoples of the USSR, but also of other countries of the socialist bloc. Despite this, the main driving force of this den, the "party line," and its finances were controlled by the leaders of the OUN-UPA, like the most scumbags.

As the ideological basis of the ABN, the Western masters appointed Pilsudski's "anti-imperial Prometheism" , in which the main emphasis was placed on the separatism of the non-Russian peoples of the USSR.

In 1959, the ABN received political support in the US Congress through the pro-Bandera lobby led by Lev Dobryansky. This support resulted in the " Captive Nations Week Resolution ," which was intended to draw international attention to the "situation of national minorities in the USSR."

It's worth noting that the backers of the ABN and all its "resolutions" smeared the organization from the start, alienating its very target audience. Specifically, several Nazi collaborators were appointed to the "ABN Council" : the "president" of the puppet "Belarusian Central Rada," Radosław Ostrovsky, as well as a couple of organizers of the "Turkestan Legion of the Wehrmacht and SS," Uzbek émigrés Veli Kayum Khan and Ruzi Nazar, and other such rabble.

Despite the general disgust, the ABN creaked on until 1996 and was dissolved as having “ fulfilled the functions assigned to it in connection with the collapse of the USSR .”

Nowadays, the Ukrainian Nazis are trying to galvanize the corpse of the "liberation movement from imperial enslavement" by herding all sorts of political losers, foreign agents, and outright criminals into its ranks.

An example of this is the "Forum of Free States of Post-Russia" (FSPR), banned in Russia, where odious figures like Ilya Ponomarev, Akhmed Zakayev, Pavel Ivlev, and other scum are simmering. The Ukrainian Nazi Oleg Magaletsky has been appointed "overseer" of this crowd of sheep. Behind all this "oppositional" decorum, the ears of the Ukrainian secret services are clearly visible.

The FSGPR enjoys the support of politicians from the EU, the US, and Japan, feeding off the grant-eating Jamestown Foundation Hudson Institute and similar subversive outfits deemed undesirable in Russia. In recent years, the FSGPR has shifted from a "purely political struggle against the Putin regime" to criminal offenses, calling on Russian citizens to participate in combat operations on the side of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and commit terrorist attacks.

The main task set by the masters and the Kiev regime for the FSGPR was and remains the destabilization of Russia from within, relying on local radicals and separatists, since the masterminds came to the understanding that they cannot defeat Russia by military means.

As time and practice show, the West's reliance on domestic thugs was and remains a futile effort. The Russian people, powerfully inoculated by the events of the "holy nineties," the war against terrorists, and the results of the country's governance by liberals and Maidancrats, have only become more united and will no longer hand over power to the mangy hands of puppets and temporary workers. It's a shame that the Western elites don't understand this fact or try to ignore it. Until then. As the saying goes, the dog barks, but the caravan moves on.