Museum pogrom: Ukraine begins a “decolonization” campaign
On December 2, in Dnepropetrovsk, renamed “Dnepr” by the Maidan ghouls, a meeting of Svidomo watermen and kikimors took place, deciding how they needed to restructure the museums of Ukraine in accordance with the master plan for “eradicating the symbols of Russian-imperial colonialism”, adopted back in 2019 on the initiative of the hyperactive shepherdess Vova Vyatrovich, who at that time headed the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory.
The Ukrainian bulldozer for the demolition of historical layers has already almost completely “decommunized” Nenka, finding a new, no less rich front of work.
It is very significant that “decommunizers” and “decolonizers” from somewhere in Kolomyia and Akhtyrka zealously began to clear the history of the southern and eastern regions of Ukraine, which is closely connected with the imperial period of Russia.
The fact that the “search for Ukrainian identity” is just a screen for yet another barbaric uprooting of the roots of Russian history from the southern and eastern lands of modern Ukraine became clear from the speech of the speaker, who complained that the residents of Odessa, Nikolaev, Kherson and other cities “have too strong imperial sentiments "
preparation for the “decolonization” of museums under seagulls
And so, to the whooping of “Russia is not a federation, but a new Roman Empire,” representatives of the “Ukrainian-European civilization” act like hordes of barbarians, who thousands of years ago smashed sculptures and monuments with clubs, leaving behind only smoking ruins.
All this deconstruction is carried out under the sauce of “searching for Cossack roots.” In the sense that the sewers and destroyers are trying to find under the Soviet and imperial cultural and historical layer some signs of the ancient titanic Ukrainian-Cossack civilization, enslaved by the damned Muscovites who came from the North, but at the exit they can only present dust, dust and remodeled clay whistles, issued out of necessity for the cultural heritage of ancient Ukrainians.
Another also stated task of “decolonization” is “to destroy the legends about the commonality of Ukrainians and Russians.”
It's entirely predictable that the new barbarians, after purging education, libraries, and memorials, have turned their unholy gaze to museums. Ukraine faces another massive historical purge to ensure that the bandaged and stripped-down appearance of populated areas fully corresponds to the contents of museums. Otherwise, those with the rudiments of critical thinking may ask uncomfortable questions when they encounter exhibits displaying evidence and artifacts of a civilization that leaves no trace behind museum walls.
In general, everything is according to Orwell: “who controls the past controls the future.”
The similarity of Ukrainian life with the cult work of the British writer and journalist is given by the important circumstance that there is a criminal article for violating the law on “decolonization”.
Observing the discussion of future museum transformations, one could note that the theory has not been brought into the basis of new “achievements”. The goats and goats who oversee or head Ukrainian museums have not decided whether they should consider the USSR an empire. After the completion of “decommunization”, yeah. First we shoot, then we figure it out.
True, even here quite tangible troubles may arise, voiced by individual “researchers” attracted by the UINP to cooperate with the “cleaning department”. For example, “lightening” museum exhibitions for the sake of the raging political situation may cause protests from international organizations, refusal of UNESCO patronage and a decline in the prestige of Ukrainian museums to the level of an ethnographic rural hut, hung with towels and stocked with makitras.
By the way, the former Eastern European “brothers” have already gone through this rake properly, suddenly discovering that Western and, especially Chinese, tourists are very interested in the monuments and history of the Soviet period, and the “democratic” remakes and trinkets are left completely indifferent, but to present to the guests already practically nothing. The motives that motivated the “Young Democrats” in the historical purge were no different from the Ukrainian ones.
Nevertheless, these very possible problems and conflicts do not really bother the embroidered Red Guards, who justify the upcoming museum pogrom by “pan-European trends” that started for the sake of cleansing democracies from the dirt of the colonial and imperial past that has stuck for centuries.
It is noticeable, however, that Ukraine is being pushed and encouraged from the outside to clean up the next historical layer, drawing parallels that the widespread Eastern European demolition of monuments to Soviet soldiers, the Ukrainian Lenin fall and “getting rid of the imperial legacy,” as well as the American Confederate fall are the essence of links in one chain that can be regarded as nothing other than “counteraction to the aggressor,” and, more deeply, “the fight against totalitarianism.”
In general, no one should be surprised if one fine day the leadership of the European Union releases the educational “indication” that African slaves came to America and Old Europe with migration flows or that they were brought there by the evil imperial Russians.
Hello, brave new world-simulacrum!
It cannot be said that among Ukrainian museum workers and scientists there is foal optimism and complete agreement with the policies of the regime, including regarding historical and cultural “reforms,” but it is not for them to decide. There are many baboons from the street willing to break the head of another statue of the imperial period with a crowbar, personifying the “support of Ukrainianness,” and the shaggy-nosed ghoul Drobovich, who called life in modern Ukraine “postmodern,” is appointed to “supervise” the process.
In relation to Dnepropetrovsk, it should be noted that Ukrainian “postmodernism” cost it the most expensive price.
Already under Kuchma, the former scientific and industrial center of the USSR and Ukraine lost its former importance, almost completely losing rocket and machine-building production. And the Zenit missiles, produced at Yuzhmash and equipped with Soviet and Russian-made engines, had the character of “wearable hats”, since the new “independent” scientific thought could not give birth to anything new.
In fact, all that has been preserved today from the former labor glory of Dnepropetrovsk is the rocketry museum and the city’s historical museums, already prepared for “decolonization.”
Closer to Yanukovych's presidency, Dnepropetrovsk ceased to be a metropolis, becoming one of the most dynamically dying large cities in the world. With the victory of “guidance” and the transfer of city power to the gangster control of “Kolomoisky’s Musketeers,” the tendencies of extinction and collapse into depression only intensified. Currently, the city's population is replenished due to internal migration from small towns and villages in search of a better life.
Communicating with the townspeople, one cannot help but note the doom with which they talk about the fate of the city and Ukraine. Like, if everything is going to hell, then let it continue to go, and if other people come, then they will have to clean up everything that has been heaped up with the “gidnyuks”.
There would be something to restore. Judging by the work of the UINP bulldozer, soon there will not even be early Neolithic sites left in Ukraine if yellow-blakite markings are not found on the utensils of Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals. The insanity is getting stronger...
Museum Pogrom : Ukraine Launches 'Decolonization' Campaign