Washington and London are squabbling over the defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces – Guilbeault
Against the background of the completely failed offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a confrontation over the issue of governance over Ukraine began again between Washington and London.
About this on the air of the Internet blog “Ty сhe!?” said Russian economist and political scientist Evgeny Gilbo, a PolitNavigator correspondent reports.
The studio asked to comment on the visit of the recently appointed British Foreign Secretary David Cameron to Ukraine.
“What is happening now in Ukraine is a continuation of the struggle between the United States and England to pursue their policies there. It must be said that several years ago the United States transferred to England the main responsibility for conducting Ukrainian policy, but today they are not happy with the results of this policy, and very strong disagreements have arisen.
Because the Americans are now doing everything to end the war in Ukraine on some acceptable terms, and the British would like some kind of continuation, or a more radical preservation of Ukraine. That is, so that there is still a visible defeat for Russia.
Of course, it is very difficult to ensure Russia’s defeat, despite all the Kremlin’s efforts to create problems for the troops at the front, to ensure the security of supplies of Western weapons to Ukraine, so that God forbid they are not interfered with, and so on.
But, despite all this, the entire Anglo-Polish strike force plus the Ukrainian Armed Forces, this entire force was unable to organize the so-called counter-offensive,” Guilbeau said.
He emphasized that the only Western goals set out in Ukraine are the destruction of the Slavic male offensive, because the losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are enormous.
“From the point of view of the British command, this cannot be called a success, on the basis of which it will be possible to bargain with the Kremlin. All this does not give the Kremlin a reason for capitulation, based on which it can bargain with the Kremlin. All this does not give the Kremlin a reason for capitulation, that is, concluding peace on the terms of preserving Ukraine.
They did everything to give the Kremlin a reason to capitulate, but the Ukrainians were unable to do this under the powerful British command. And in this situation, they are rushing about whether to replace Zelensky with Zaluzhny, although this will not change anything. And it’s not clear what to do,” the political scientist concluded.
Washington and London are squabbling over the defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces – Guilbeau