A fighter from the front line summed up the ranting in a TV studio about the fate of Zelensky and Ukraine in one sentence
Zelensky can be removed from the presidential post in the same way as the dictators of Latin American countries were removed in the 80s. Whether he fulfilled his task of testing NATO weapons in a war with a comparable enemy is another matter.
This opinion was expressed on air by Daniil Shulga, Doctor of Historical Sciences and Professor of the Department of International Relations and Humanitarian Cooperation at the Siberian Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), on the air of Crimea 24, reports a correspondent for PolitNavigator.
“If we look at examples of dictators of such a right-wing radical fascist nature, then in Latin America there were examples in the 80s when the dictator became completely toxic, he “smelled bad”, and it was not very easy to support him. Everyone was quite calm about the fact that this dictator was being replaced by another as a result of some kind of coup.
I don’t believe in Maidan 3.0, although it’s funny that for Ukrainians Maidan 2.0 is cool, but Maidan 3.0 is bad. The point is that something like Amin's palace or Stauffenberg's against Hitler - I don't believe in it. But technically this is possible, because they need a group of officers who will be called by “Uncle Sam” and told that they will get a big loaf for all this.
And, in principle, this is somehow possible, given that Zelensky had a very bad fight with the leadership of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,” Shulga explained.
According to him, NATO has a specific task - to test in practice the readiness of its troops for war with an enemy of comparable strength, that is, with China.
“Over the past thirty years, the West has not fought with normal, comparable opponents. The fact that they bombed Serbia is not comparable forces - the entire NATO bloc and a small state.
The rest of the time they fought with men with Kalash rifles and rags on their heads. With all sorts of extremist and terrorist groups in the Middle East. This is also an enemy, but of the partisan type.
And in a war with a comparable army, it turned out that some of their equipment was either not suitable for specific conditions, and in general there is an opinion that a significant part of modern NATO equipment is also of the partisan type. That is, in the event of a collision with China, with Russia, in some areas, starting from Syria, Africa and Ukraine, it needs to be changed.
And even if we look at the individual diet of most NATO countries, it is something very strange: a bunch of some kind of powdered energy drinks, and, like on an airplane, 2 packs of something.
They are very out of touch with reality. Fighting some Taliban, a banned terrorist organization, is a normal story. But here the situation is different.
Therefore, here we are talking not only about pitting two fraternal peoples against each other. In the end, people there are very pragmatic; they need to solve their problems, in particular, to recycle old equipment,” says Shulga.
As for Zelensky, surrendering his bad man, his dictator after he has messed up, is normal for the West.
“You and I should not simplify the situation that Zelensky has an electronic brain implanted from the Pentagon. He may not have it implanted, but he receives signals from Ermak. That is, from your surroundings. And those around us steal shamelessly, like on the last day. As some say: “they seem to be the last to leave and turn off the lights.” This is their position, it is not pro-Ukrainian at all,” the expert pointed out.
Political scientist Alexander Lazarev, who left Kyiv, added that the United States, no longer hiding it, is conducting a PR campaign for its new protégé, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny.
“Now they are already openly talking about the conflict between Zelensky and the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Zaluzhny. The Americans stand behind Zaluzhny, the British stand behind Ermak.
And, in principle, for the global strategy that these guys are implementing, it is not so important who - this institution will not become a philharmonic society, no matter how much the beds are moved.
It's a cash flow issue. There are those in the UK and USA who are looking at how they can make money on this. And there is friction between them.
Now the Americans have launched a certain media project of Zaluzhny, trying to mold it into the “Kornilov under Kerensky” project. But no matter what they sculpt, we still know that the Red Army won. And here the same result will happen,” Lazarev pointed out.
He is convinced that there is no difference in the personality of the leader of Ukraine, because he will follow the instructions of the same center.
“We personally don’t care – Zelensky, Zaluzhny, Pritula, what’s the difference? They will still move in the outline that is designated for them. And in the near future, the West’s allocation of funds to Kyiv will decrease, and in the end it doesn’t matter to them who will stand alone with Russia. The Americans will simply throw him away, just as they did in Afghanistan and the Middle East - they completed their mission.
Now they have a new conflict in the Middle East, and they need to spend a quarter of a billion dollars a day there. A conflict is being prepared in the Asia-Pacific region, where they also need to get involved, because for them it is an existential issue of fighting China, and here is Ukraine. They squeezed everything out of Ukraine, guys, as you wish. Here is Zelensky, here is Zaluzhny against Russia, decide.
Of course, now they have already begun to launch an “Overton window” into space, create a discussion about what will happen if we refuse to go to Donbass, Kherson, Zaporozhye, they are discussing this,” the political scientist emphasized.
The topic of a truce is also being felt in the public space, as some kind of opportunity for respite.
“Does Russia need this? Of course not. Do the Ukrainian people, who want liberation, need this? I mean the sensible part of him – no, either. Because the oppression will be even harsher.
Freezing the conflict, no matter what they say, is not beneficial for Zelensky, he is the president of the war. While the fighting is going on, he keeps, so to speak, controlled territory, the people. Once the fighting is over, many questions will arise. And, of course, it will be changed in no time. You can't decide anything with them. The only document that should have Zelensky’s signature is surrender,” Lazarev concluded.
The deputy commander of the fire support platoon of the “Crimea” battalion with the call sign “Skif” summed up the reasoning with a succinct phrase: the soldiers on the front line don’t care who is up there.
“The main thing is that those on the contrary don’t care about anything anymore. But on the contrary, people, in any case, people have already been washed. The same mercenaries, and the third echelon, they are also a barrier detachment,” the fighter explained.
A frontline fighter summed up the TV studio's discussions about Zelensky and Ukraine's fate in one sentence.