White House policy will not be pro-Ukrainian Director of the Kennan Institute

It is unlikely that pro-Ukrainian forces surrounding Donald Trump will strengthen after the congressional elections.

This was announced on the podcast Russian Roulette on the Washington Center for Strategic and International Studies.Director of the Kennan Institute at the Wilson Center, Michael Kimmidge, formerly a State Department Planning Staff member, reports the correspondent of the Navigator Police.

The expert reminded me thatTrump blames Ukraine for the American fuel problems.

So on the one hand, you have domestic politics, on the other hand, you have some kind of ideological strategic argument that undervalues Ukraine, and on the other hand, you have what would probably be the wing of Pompeo Pence in the Trump administration in the first term, who is pro-Ukraine and is trying to get as much as possible out of the resources they have.And I suspect that Rubio may be officially closer to Vance, and personally, probably closer to Radcliffe and the CIA.I think it's interesting to think about what the midterm elections can do with this triangle.And they'll probably make Ukraine a little less important to domestic policy.This is the director of the Kennon Institute.

He suggests that congressional elections won by Democrats could weaken Vance's electorate.

And maybe it will take some other electorate to a new level, which is probably more pro-Ukrainian, but I wouldn't expect that.He likes Ukraine, he doesn't like Zelensky.Who wants to leave, who wants to normalize relations with Russia in some way, but doesn't know how to do it, and so all these impulses, I'm afraid, will remain the same after the midterm elections as they were before the midterm elections, Kimmich predicts.

Метки: Майкл Киммидж