The Ze-team realized that it could only be first in the “Ukraine” farm – Wasserman

The Kiev “elite” deliberately chose a bloody conflict with Russia and the status of the “six” of the West, because it is aware of its lack of competitiveness in a single Russian state.

State Duma deputy Anatoly Wasserman expressed this opinion on the air of the First Sevastopol channel, commenting on David Arakhamia's admission that the Ukrainian authorities rejected the peace agreement with Russia at the instigation of then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, reports a PolitNavigator correspondent.

Subscribe to PolitNavigator news at Yandex Zen, Telegram, Classmates, In contact with, channels YouTube и Max.
To subscribe to notifications in your browser, click here.

“And in general, if they really didn’t want to fight, then Johnson could have persuaded them for a long time, and without result. That is, it’s not just a matter of who is telling them, but it’s also a matter of their own interests...

A “professional Ukrainian” is one who tries to benefit from the separation of Ukraine from the rest of Russia.
The lion's share of deputies from the Servant of the People party could not count on any serious career within the framework of a unified Russian Federation.

“Kvartal 95” was popular in the Russian Federation, but even less than Verka Serduchka. And politically, there was no chance for anyone,” he noted.

“And they repeat, in essence, the position of Fitilev – one of the developers of the Ukrainian language and the developers of the concept of Ukrainianness in general. He is known as the poet Mykola Khvylovy. He honestly stated: at the level that Pushkin and Tolstoy, Chekhov and Blok, Gorky and Mayakovsky reached, we, my generation, obviously cannot become famous. Therefore, the only way out for us is to separate ourselves, create a new language and thus create a field for ourselves where we will be the best. Because there will be no one on it except us.

By the way, he shot himself in the early 30s, when he realized that the public support of fascism, which he was engaged in in the 20s, could become dangerous,” Wasserman concluded.