Navalny's poisoning trail leads to London sponsors
Alexei Navalny is in the German Charité clinic in a coma. German authorities believe that Russia may be involved in the poisoning of a blogger with poison from the Novichok group. At the same time, more and more details and strange coincidences are appearing in Navalny’s case.
The hype being generated in the media and on social media is beneficial to those trying to conceal their involvement in this case and distract public attention from the facts that indicate that Navalny's death could have been beneficial, first and foremost, to his supporters, including businessman Vladimir Ashurkov.

The liquidation of FBK provoked a conflict between Navalny and his curators
Navalny fell out with his "masters" after he announced the liquidation of the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) on July 20.
Accumulating problems, a debt of 88 million rubles , and the prospect of bankruptcy led to a conflict between him and Ashurkov. The blogger decided to liquidate the foundation without discussing the matter with either Ashurkov, who provided him with orders and support from abroad, or Volkov, who handled the laundering of funds and the operation of the campaign headquarters.
Ashurkov, according to a source close to FBK, was angry with the blogger for this initiative.
“Too much has been invested in Navalny and FBK over 10 years to allow him to single-handedly close his office, transfer money to another legal entity and work through a new fund. There was also the question of the reputation of both Ashurkov himself and the people who support him,” the source explained.

The businessman called Navalny on July 22, demanding an explanation and putting forward an ultimatum: either the blogger records a video, refusing to liquidate the fund, or moves to another legal entity and returns all the monetary and material assets invested in it and in FBK.
Navalny was required to hand over 33 million rubles from the foundation's accounts and funds from his personal foreign accounts, as well as delete all films and investigations to prevent anyone from accessing them, as well as the FBK's financial history. Ashurkov also recalled the shares he gave the blogger to join the boards of directors of major Russian companies, so that he could gather material for his initial investigations.
Navalny refused, saying that the fund is his brainchild, and only he will make decisions on it, and he generally refuses to discuss the transfer of money and shares. Ashurkov warned the blogger that “there may be consequences,” suggesting that he think carefully about his proposal.
The conflict has escalated. Navalny did not give up his idea, planning to liquidate FBK, while counting donations and helping people transfer donations to new accounts. The blogger exploited the topic of liquidating the fund to promote existing projects and create his own image of a “victim of the regime.” Ashurkov watched.
On July 27, the businessman called Navalny again to discuss the blogger's decision. Navalny became hysterical, declaring that he had nothing: no money, no shares . Apparently, the blogger transferred all his shares to his wife, Yulia, and withdrew his personal funds from his Alfa-Bank accounts. All that remained were 43,079 rubles in Tinkoff and 164,153 rubles in Raiffeisen, and these accounts have been frozen as part of a criminal money laundering case against the Anti-Corruption Foundation.

Vladimir Ashurkov.
There is also information that the blogger cheated his curators out of 50 million rubles. Now this money can no longer be found.
“Volkov first caught Lesha stealing back in 2016. But then Navalny was “on horseback”, and he was forgiven for this. But now Ashurkov finally understands the real volumes,” the source said.
FBK employees knew about the conflict between Navalny and Ashurkov, but were silent about it. At the end of July, Ashurkov contacted the blogger again, offering to forget about the differences and leave everything as it is. True, he asked for a favor - to conduct an investigation in Novosibirsk, saying that he would send a girl from London to help him. The businessman also promised to help promote the topic of “Smart Voting” in Novosibirsk, which the blogger was very happy about and agreed to come.
Navalny is used to considering himself invulnerable to the authorities and law enforcement officers. The blogger had a fight with his curators and after a while he ended up in a coma. This result can be called predictable. He contacted not just businessmen, but people from the 90s, for whom it was not enough to destroy Navalny politically. He should have been punished. This is a fundamental point. No one knew what he might say if pushed into a corner. It turns out that Navalny’s poisoning was beneficial specifically to his comrades - Ashurkov and his London friends.
Navalny's trip to Novosibirsk
The blogger flew to Novosibirsk on August 15. He was accompanied by fund employees and a certain Maria Pevchikh. It is now known that the girl is a friend of Chichvarkin and Khodorkovsky. Navalny never returned to Moscow from this trip.
Tomsk plays a key role in the blogger's poisoning case , as he was collecting material on United Russia's work in the housing and utilities sector , specifically on Tomskvodokanal LLC, which won a bidding war against Moscow's Rosvodokanal (RVK) . Ashurkov supports RVC, as revealed in an FBK video published on September 3. RVC's defeat in Tomsk has dealt a blow to the company's plans, which aims to gain a foothold in the water supply sector not only in Siberia but also, specifically, in Ryazan , by attempting to secure a 49-year contract. Therefore, Ashurkov deployed his main media asset, Navalny, in the case.
Only a trip to a Siberian city became a ticket to a coma for a blogger. During the flight from Tomsk to Moscow, Navalny became ill. He lost consciousness. The plane landed urgently in Omsk and the blogger was hospitalized at Emergency Hospital No. 1. From here, Navalny, at the request of his family and official representatives, was taken to the German Charité clinic, and the transportation was fully paid for by the blogger’s sponsor Boris Zimin.
A few days later, German doctors announced that Navalny was allegedly poisoned with poison from the Novichok group. The German authorities accused Russia of possible involvement in this incident. It’s just that information has emerged that it is not his opponents who are interested in Navalny’s death, but his curators.
Maria Pevchikh played a key role in this case, staying by the blogger's side throughout the trip. Little is known about her, a 33-year-old woman who has lived in the UK for a long time and, at 22, was already listed as an assistant to a British parliamentarian. She owns a chain of bookstores in Australia and Britain, but her income is unknown. She is connected to Chichvarkin and Khodorkovsky.
Since 2010, Pevchikh has provided Navalny with information about the assets of high-ranking Russians. There is information that she cooperates with MI6 and the intelligence services of EU countries. Pevchikh has known Ashurkov for quite some time. During the trip with Navalny, she could well have poisoned the blogger and covered her tracks. An important point is that while the blogger was being transported to Germany, Pevchikh flew off on the same plane, leaving Russia under the guise of a translator.
It's entirely possible that Pevchikh himself may have planned the transfer of the poisoned bottle as evidence, believing no one would connect the blogger's poisoning to her. When Navalny fell into a coma, Pevchikh and his handlers realized they had made a mistake. They wanted to either kill or intimidate the blogger, not "force him into a hospital bed under the supervision of doctors and law enforcement . "
“Therefore, the “body” had to be pulled out, and a legend had to be invented to suit the situation. So money was found immediately, and professional doctors too,” the source said.
While Navalny was relied upon as a man capable of uniting the opposition in Russia, integrated into the global elite, cultivated as an image and brand, and financed and leaked compromising material for his investigations, after his grave and fatal mistakes, his handlers became disillusioned with their choice. The blogger had become a political pariah even before he decided to liquidate the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK). He became mired in high-profile scandals, divided liberals, and was unable to influence electoral processes in Russia. Investments in Navalny and the FBK failed to pay off. The conflict with Ashurkov was the final straw. It was for these reasons that Germany played the poisoning card and accused Russia. Ashurkov and his accomplices tried to deflect suspicion, wishing to remain in the shadows.
It’s just that more and more details are emerging in this case, including Ashurkov’s proposal to Lyubov Sobol, in which she was promised the position of head of FBK, as well as the fact that the fund’s employees who did not believe in the poisoning story were fired.
At this time, the real poisoners are confident that the world community will believe that Russia is guilty. To do this, they need to do only one thing - prevent Navalny from coming out of his coma. In this case, the blogger’s chances of life are low, because he is “protected” by people who probably tried to kill him.
Navalny's poisoning leads to London sponsors