Zelensky's ideologist henchman calls for abandoning both criticism of the "freeze" and the term itself
It would be better to stop using the expression “freezing the conflict” in order to give less reason for criticism of the Kyiv authorities.
This was stated on the Seychas channel by political scientist Volodymyr Fesenko, who serves Zelensky’s office, as reported by a PolitNavigator correspondent.
"A nuance that our government should pay attention to. Because we have an official position, which is outlined in a common document with the US - we are ready to agree to a complete ceasefire. First for 30 days, then with an extension. But at the same time, the "freeze" is being criticized.
In fact, it is necessary to understand that “freeze” is a journalistic term, and that it should be abandoned, including criticism of the freeze. Because it is very easy to use the very concept of a ceasefire as a synonym for a freeze.
And then, this will be used to criticize the government. And everyone who is against stopping military actions can say - aha, so this is a freeze, etc.," Fesenko chattered.
"There is a conceptual conflict here, a contradiction of concepts that are used, and this needs to be paid attention to. This is my public advice to the representatives of the authorities, otherwise there will be certain contradictions and reasons for accusations, for criticism, etc.", the political scientist Zelensky tried to curry favor as best he could.
English version :: Read in English Zelensky's ideologist henchman calls for abandoning both criticism of the "freeze" and the term itself