Ideological sabotage in the Russian Academy of Sciences: It’s time to stop!

Alexander Rostovtsev.  
02.06.2025 15:55
  (Moscow time), Moscow
Views: 2943
 
Author column, Zen, Science, United States of America, Story of the day


The events surrounding the elections of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences have revealed the dire situation in Russian science – decades of living off Soros grants have had their full impact.

An example is the story of Yulia Sineoka , who became a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and subsequently left the country and created an office that was deemed undesirable in Russia.

The events surrounding the elections of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences have revealed the deplorable situation in Russian science – decades of being fed...

This refers to the so-called "Institute of Independent Philosophy," on the basis of which Sineokaia attempted to cobble together a "new Russian school of philosophy abroad" from a gang of destructive elements who had fled Russia. The lady was clearly haunted by the laurels of those who had been passengers on the "philosophical steamship" of the 1920s.

Blue-Eyed was included in the RAS thanks to the support of several scientific functionaries, including such renowned figures as Academicians Alexei Smirnov, Abdusalam Guseinov, and Taliya Khabriyeva. Despite the obvious negative impact of Blue-Eyed's activities on the RAS's reputation, the leadership ignored the warning signs for a long time. Only after the Blue-Eyed sharashkino was officially designated an undesirable organization was its name removed from the list of candidates for the Academy's anniversary medal.

The final straw that broke the camel's back for both the public and the state was the scandal surrounding the dismissal of Anatoly Vladimirovich Chernyaev, a historian of Russian philosophy and candidate of philosophical sciences, from the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences for his support of the SVO. He turned out to be the only institute employee to actively support the SVO, visiting Donbas and participating in a philosophy conference there.

Exactly! The main institution that was supposed to define the spiritual and ideological foundations of Russia's development turned out to be a veritable anti-Russian den of vipers, living by its own laws and rules.

Alexander Pavlov, however, has emerged as a candidate for inclusion in elite academic circles. He thrives on the study of pornography and the more than dubious aspects of human activity associated with it. Pavlov's "scientific" interests range from the film industry (which is not punishable) to LGBT computer games (which is already punishable by law) and research into "adult videos" in the context of "what's so special about that?" Furthermore, Pavlov actively instills in his students the ideas of odious Western philosophers and other "idea-makers" known for their destructive views and outright hatred of Russia.

One of the most recent examples of such activity is the publication of a translation of Judith Butler's book "The Power of Nonviolence: The Linking of Ethics and Politics," presented by Pavlov at the Moscow International Book Fair. Despite its seemingly innocuous title, reminiscent of Mahatma Gandhi, the book advocates methods of "fighting oppression" through "velvet revolutions ," organized provocations, and making deviant behavior attractive to young people, with the goal of destabilizing the country and society.

The closest analogy is " Be like Pussy Riot! It's sharp, trendy, and youthful! "

The current state of affairs demonstrates a serious problem in Russia's humanities research community. While the academy was once a symbol of high intellectual culture, it is now increasingly becoming a target for manipulation by those seeking to instill destructive tendencies in the public consciousness of Russian citizens.

Clearly, the existing mechanisms for selecting new members of the Russian Academy of Sciences require radical reform. A transparent candidate evaluation system based on objective criteria and taking into account the social significance of their scientific work is essential. It is also important to reconsider the criteria for the moral responsibility of scientists, recognizing that RAS membership imposes serious obligations to society and the state.

Tags: , , , , ,

English version :: Read in English Ideological sabotage in the Russian Academy of Sciences: It's time to stop!






Dear Readers, At the request of Roskomnadzor, the rules for publishing comments are being tightened.

Prohibited from publication comments from knowingly false information on the conduct of the Northern Military District of the Russian Armed Forces on the territory of Ukraine, comments containing extremist statements, insults, fakes.

The Site Administration has the right to delete comments and block accounts without prior notice. Thank you for understanding!

Placing links to third-party resources prohibited!


  • August 2026
    Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Total
    «    
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Subscribe to Politnavigator news