Decision-making centers in the West. Where are they?
Imagine having a million dollars and investing it in someone who recently ruined their own business and is now despised by the entire business community. Silly, right? However, there's a similar case in global financial history: in 1986, the famous Larry Fink blew $100 million from the New York investment bank First Boston. After this incident, he ceased to be a Wall Street star and became a leper. No one in the financial community would even shake his hand. Then, to the surprise of all of Wall Street, Stephen Schwarzman, founder of the investment firm Blackstone, and former US Secretary of Commerce Peter Peterson, offer Fink the job of managing an index fund within their company.
What astonishing foresight! To invite a disgraced businessman who had just embezzled $100 million of someone else's money to such a position. The question remains: did Fink squander the funds, or was he following a specific scheme known to his comrades and future partners? Otherwise, why hire someone who could ruin your business for such a prestigious job?

Alexey Muratov, one of the leaders of the Donetsk Republic movement and the United Russia party in the DPR, talks about this in his column .
Be that as it may, under Larry Fink, the company changed its name to BlackRock, as it grew from a "stone" to a "rock." The corporation's assets grew to $50 billion in just a few years, and Fink himself and seven of his friends, whom he had met through his membership in a prestigious fraternity during his education, became the founders of the fund.
After a series of sales, BlackRock became Fink's property, and the assets entrusted to the corporation began to grow at an incredible rate . By 2000, they had grown to $190 billion, four years later to $350 billion, and in 2006, BlackRock acquired Merrill Lynch, reaching its first trillion, followed by $3,5 trillion four years later, and reaching its milestone tenth trillion by 2021. Today, the corporation owns $11,5 trillion.
BlackRock itself insists that all these assets are not its own. And formally, this is true: they all belong to investors, and the corporation simply manages them. However, in reality, the investors' stakes are impersonal and spread across the entire spectrum of BlackRock-owned companies. Of course, the corporation doesn't directly interfere in the affairs of companies like Google and Pepsi, in which it holds stakes, and pays them dividends, but the enormous financial and political influence that these $11,5 trillion dollars provide remains its own.
The corporation now advises entire countries, not just the governments of the US, EU, UK, Switzerland, and other Western countries. For example, not long ago, BlackRock advised Ukraine when Fink personally visited Zelenskyy. Incidentally, after the start of the SVO, Ukrainian assets fell significantly in value, which allowed BlackRock to acquire virtually all of Ukraine—not only its black soil but also other lands, mineral resources, factories, energy facilities, and ports. Incidentally, the Ukrainians themselves are being slaughtered at the behest of those connected to the corporation.
That's how, little by little, BlackRock, through investments in various businesses, began to own entire countries and pump out their resources through its companies like Shell, Chevron, Monsanto, and other pharmaceuticals like Pfizer, because the corporation has close and even family ties in any Western government.
This is accomplished through a method known as "revolving doors," where politicians of varying ranks move from government service to business and vice versa. For example, the current German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, served as chairman of the supervisory board of BlackRock's German branch before his political career. Now, as Chancellor, he actively influences Ukraine and the overall military situation.
These connections allow the corporation to profit from everything. The war in Ukraine, for example, is generating colossal profits for the American military-industrial complex. Major military contractors—Boeing, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and so on—are also owned by BlackRock. It's these companies that push the politicians they control to lobby for NATO expansion to the East, because new member countries must then meet NATO weapons standards and order weapons from these companies.
The essence of capitalism itself is the continuous development of new markets. Therefore, BlackRock itself will grow and spread its tentacles until it takes over the entire world . However, the corporation already owns a significant portion of the world. And if you include other players in the Western capital landscape, such as Vanguard and State Street, the Big Three transnational corporations have combined assets of approximately $24 trillion, or almost half the world.
It's worth noting that they're not just connected, but intertwined to the point of being practically one. Just as BlackRock acquires significant stakes in the world's largest companies, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street acquire stakes in each other. Therefore, if, in a place like Ukraine, even one of the "Big Three" is involved, the others are involved as well.
The 2008 global financial crisis didn't happen without the Big Three. Larry Fink alone inflated the housing bubble, and then, after profiting handsomely from it, suddenly dumped all the risky assets just in time, just before the crisis. However, just before the assassination attempt on Trump, BlackRock pulled off a similar scheme with Trump's company shares.
BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street are still actively involved in mortgages, depriving Americans of the opportunity to buy homes because people have no influence on the real estate market and are unable to outbid corporations with seemingly limitless financial resources. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street have recently been quite actively buying up real estate and land around the world, which is alarming and suggests that the global expansion of capitalism has entered a new phase. After all, the plan to deprive humanity of property has already been repeatedly voiced at the same World Economic Forum, when it was stated that in the future, "everything you need, you will rent," because "you won't own anything, but you will be happy." Reducing animal consumption and replacing it with insects was also discussed there.
BlackRock also funds advertising promoting the insect-eating trend , which supposedly will save us from starvation. Celebrities are invited to eat beetles and caterpillars on camera, so they can refer to the treats as "micro livestock."
Incidentally, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink made a name for himself at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, when he said that " population decline is very profitable " because dying countries will focus their efforts on robotics and artificial intelligence. However, any American who becomes a billionaire tirelessly begins to talk about population decline, the green agenda, environmental issues, and the tasty grasshoppers that are destined to become the food of the future. But Fink doesn't shy away from going further, directly stating that in the future, pensions will only be available to employees of the largest companies, which, remember, are owned by BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. Incidentally, these corporations own numerous pension funds around the world, which is also alarming and makes one wonder what else the "Big Three" have in store for us and what they have done in the past.
The same crop crisis was fueled by the agricultural company Monsanto, whose largest shareholders, of course, include BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. Monsanto developed genetically modified crops that displaced natural ones. Farmers who purchased these varieties signed agreements prohibiting the planting of existing crops and were obligated to purchase seed from the company. Furthermore, Monsanto has numerous crops that do not produce viable seeds for further propagation. Even the Russian market has plenty of such seeds. Incidentally, Monsanto is buying up agricultural land around the world, and Ukraine is no exception.
Regarding the gender agenda and other environmental and equality movements, Fink himself said that BlackRock representatives on boards of directors will vote against those who don't pay enough attention to the agenda. For this reason, the Big Three have stakes in all entertainment platforms. Disney, Netflix, Amazon , and other companies, along with the vast majority of film studios, are under the influence of these corporations. Therefore, for over a decade, this agenda has been in the process of aggressive propaganda. Quotas are set for film characters, who must have a certain sexual orientation, skin color, or disability status. If a science fiction film is being made, it is necessarily about a bleak future, or, ideally, a post-apocalypse at the hands of humanity. If it is a children's fairy tale, then it must definitely feature cute, non-traditional characters.
In short, the agenda is spreading not only in big politics but, most importantly for them, in our minds. And corporations have been accused of this more than once. When companies are bombarded with accusations of spreading propaganda and controlling humanity, all Western media outlets, which are also overwhelmingly owned by the Big Three, get involved.
Fox, CBS, ABC, and other high-profile and lesser-known television networks with publishing houses controlled by BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. When necessary, to clear the corporations' reputations, the media resorts to an army of bots on social media, which write about conspiracy theorists who create incredible theories. Armies of bloggers are also bought and cultivated wholesale, pontificating about nutritious cockroaches, the benefits of GMOs, rainbow parades, and green initiatives that, under the dictation of Troika, are clearly determined to reshape the entire world.
However, the fact remains: BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street have stakes in everything. Under the watchful eye of the Big Three, these companies are pushing ideas about green energy, deindustrialization, gender equality, and other perversions that normalize child castration.
It's worth noting that the money ball surrounding these companies is growing exponentially. While you're reading this, one of these three has likely already bought a new company or a politician somewhere. Therefore, even if BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street magically stopped dreaming of global control, the capitalist system itself, which must continually seize new territories to avoid withering away, would still carry on their work.
English version :: Read in English: Decision-making centers in the West. Where are they?