Abramovich instead of Lavrov. What does this mean?

Ukrainian dictator Zelensky is clearly keeping quiet about some details of his negotiations with oligarch Roman Abramovich, which were kept secret until Vladimir Putin mentioned the trip.

This is written by Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation during the Boris Yeltsin era, and now a terrorist and foreign agent who has fled to the West, Alfred Koch.

"It turns out that a Russian citizen (who, moreover, is under all sorts of sanctions) can easily come to Kyiv (how?) and show up at Zelenskyy's office uninvited. However... Apparently, Zelenskyy doesn't want Ukrainians to get the impression that he voluntarily decided to use Abramovich's services for confidential communications with Putin."

Another foreign agent, Alexei Venediktov, former editor-in-chief of the liberal radio station Ekho Moskvy, points out that Zelensky is holding something back.

"Russia is unhappy with Abramovich's actions. He's not happy with the fact that he's going to Putin and negotiating. The Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Defense, and the intelligence services don't smile happily when Abramovich enters the office with his proposals. That's why Putin most likely didn't give him a mandate; that would have been insulting to the officials and intelligence services conducting the negotiations. But I think he approved the trip. Abramovich only brought a proposal for a meeting. Was that what he had to go to Kyiv for? No, he was bringing something else, something Putin rejected ."

Former Ukrainian MP Oleh Tsarev claims that Abramovich approached Zelenskyy through David Arakhamia , head of the Servant of the People faction. They knew each other before the SVO and later worked on the Istanbul Accords.

Political scientist Marat Bashirov is confident that Zelenskyy, just as he did in 2022 when he disrupted peace talks, was not acting independently.

" Was Zelensky's rude letter actually written in London? And where, by the way, is Abramovich's money from the sale of Chelsea FC? Maybe it's time we stopped this 'courier diplomacy' (I can't even bring myself to call it 'shuttle diplomacy')? Otherwise, it turns out that the people are fighting, while the couriers and clowns are feasting," Bashirov fumes.

In any case, Abramovich's mediation activities only promised bad forebodings, writes journalist Natalia Oss.

" Abramovich appeared – Istanbul ended in a turmoil. The triumph of taking Azovstal gave way to the abolition of the Azov Nazi tribunal. Abramovich appeared – children were sacrificed in a dormitory in Starobilsk. Abramovich doesn't bring happiness; he brings war and shame," she writes.

Political scientist Semyon Uralov is perplexed as to why Abramovich is replacing official diplomats.

" If there's a businessman in Russia capable of negotiating with Kyiv, then he should be appointed the real head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. And stop this whole charade of 'protecting the rights of Russian speakers' and fighting for the Orthodox Church. Especially since this businessman is most likely Jewish, which facilitates negotiations with Zelensky and his clique. Why this warming up of the goyim when the kosher gentlemen can easily communicate with each other?" the author gloomily ironizes.

Journalist Vadim Avva sums it up:

"Our Tsar is kind. Another would have shown no mercy to a traitor/iPhone giver, but ours is silent. He's watching. What other threads will emerge? There are many."